BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
EGA
Docket No: 780
an Se ee
27 Ualtiual y
cea:
This is in reference to your reconsideration request dated 26
June 2014. You previously petitioned the Board and were advised
in our letter of 9 November 1999, that your application had been
denied.
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-
member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session on 28 January 2015. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application and any material submitted in support of
at
your application.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board determined that your assertion of post-
traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) since leaving the military,
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. The Board may only consider assertions of
PTSD when the applicant presents clear evidence that the PTSD 138
service connected and related to the applicant’s alleged error
or injustice. Despite providing liberal consideration of your
PTSD claim, the Board determined it insufficient to warrant
relief. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applyin
naval record, the burden is
existence of probable material
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
ec
NO
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7804 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 28 January 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that your assertion of post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) since leaving the military, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13226 14
Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 8 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that your assertion of post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and the letter you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13226 14_Redacted
Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 8 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that your assertion of post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and the letter you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR517 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, you were counseled and warned after your first NJP, that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR517 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2015. Despite stating that you were dealing with PTSD while on active duty, the Board determined it insufficient to warrant relief since there is no evidence in the record to support your assertion of PTSD. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2170 15_Redacted
Your request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Your assertion of PTSD was carefully considered by the Board in light of the Secretary of Defense’s Memorandum “Supplemental Guidance to Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR2170 15_Redacted
Your request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Your assertion of PTSD was carefully considered by the Board in light of the Secretary of Defense’s Memorandum “Supplemental Guidance to Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2151 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2015. , The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgrade your character of service and assertion of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a reason for your misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5880 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2015. After applying these guidelines to the evidence in the case, the Board was not able to substantiate the existence of PTSD in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13098 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...